Legal Opinion
Matcha v. Winn
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 1, 1981No. 1 CA-CIV 5125PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
The sole issue on appeal is the validity of a recorded declaration of homestead which lacks an express statement of Arizona residency and designates the property value as a sum not exceeding the statutory exemption limit. Briefly stated, the undisputed facts underlying this litigation are as follows.
Appellants George R. and Mary Kay Winn (Winn), purchased certain reál property in Phoenix, Arizona as their residence in November, 1960. In 1974, the Winns recorded a document entitled “Claim of Homestead Exemption” which contains a legal description of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Adroit Supply Co. v. Electric Mutual Liability InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Pima County v. BilbyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Schoenfeld v. NorbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- First National Bank of Mesa v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Johnson v. BraunerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- White v. Brown (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Morn v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Rogone v. CorreiaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- In Re IrwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.