Legal Opinion

State v. Hodges

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1981No. 802SC774PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The principal question raised by this appeal is whether the defendant’s Due Process Right was violated by the prosecution’s refusal to disclose the identity of an informant who was present during and participated in the offenses charged.

At the outset we note that we are not concerned with probable cause for an arrest or probable cause for a search warrant under G.S. 15A-978. See State v. Ketchie, 286 N.C. 387, 211 S.E. 2d 207 (1975). Instead, we are involved with guilt or innocence, the right of the defendant to know the identity of a participating informant in advance of trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. KetchieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. OrrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RoseboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. GraingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. TateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. TateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API