Legal Opinion

State v. Roseboro

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1981No. 8114SC550PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Before the trial of this case, defendant made a motion that the State be ordered to disclose the identity of a confidential informer whose information led to the issuance of the search warrant for 705 Bacon Street. That motion was denied, and defendant now argues that the trial court’s action violated his constitutional right to confront witnesses against him. We do not agree.

In Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed. 2d 639 (1957), the Supreme Court dealt with the question of revealing the name of an informer where petitioner had been charged with the sale of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. CloningerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. DrakeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. BejarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API