Legal Opinion

State v. Grainger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1982No. 8218SC469PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Defendant makes two assignments of error that he consolidates for argument: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of contraband found in defendant’s possession; and (2) whether the court erred in denying defendant’s motion to disclose a confidential informant. Defendant in essence argues that the trial court’s failure to order disclosure warranted suppression of the evidence at trial and justifies reversal or a new trial. We find no error in the judgments below.

The evidence offered at trial reveals that an informant advised the North…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Herman Russell McLawhorn III v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. KeysCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. NewkirkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. LeazerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API