Legal Opinion

State v. Tate

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 3, 1982No. 8121SC1199PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

Pre-Trial Motions

Prior to trial both defendants filed motions to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant or, in the alternative, to identify the alleged confidential informant referred to in the application for the search warrant. In support of her 12 February 1981 “MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND/OR TO IDENTIFY INFORMANT,” the defendant Beverly Tate filed an affidavit. This affidavit was incorporated for support by both defendants in their motions. Beverly swore that on the morning of 5 November 1980 Barry Wayne Morgan called and indicated he would like to talk…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. The People v. GallowayIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. RollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. RollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API