State v. Ketchie
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
The sole question brought forward on defendant’s appeal to this Court is whether the prosecution is privileged to refuse disclosure of the informer’s identity. Both the trial court and the Court of Appeals answered in the affirmative and defendant urges reversal of that decision.
The general rule, subject to certain exceptions and limitations, recognizes the prosecution’s privilege to withhold the identity of an informer. State v. Cameron, 283 N.C. 191, 195 S.E. 2d 481 (1973) ; State v. Fletcher and State v. St. Arnold, 279 N.C. 85, 181 S.E. 2d 405 (1971) ; State v. Swaney,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. McZornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. CheekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. ChadwickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. NewkirkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.