Legal Opinion

Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 21, 1942No. 620 CivilPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

At the hearing, the Court stated orally that the motions would be denied as to all parts thereof except with reference to Paragraphs XIX, XXI and XXII of the complaint, and motions with respect thereto were taken under advisement. These paragraphs refer primarily to the damages which plaintiff claims to have sustained as a result of the alleged conspiracy. They read as follows:

“XIX. That all of the acts, agreements, and conspiracies herein alleged were done and performed contrary to and in violation of the laws of the United States, and, particularly, the Sherman…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  5. Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  3. Baim & Blank v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. Clark Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1944
  5. Charles Rubenstein, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API