Legal Opinion

Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1941No. 11902PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover treble damages by the plaintiff, appellant here, an oil jobber in Duluth, Minnesota, for losses alleged to have been sustained by it due to violation, by appellee and other major oil companies, of the Sherman Anti-Trust Law. Act July 2, 1890, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note. The case is based upon the government prosecution and conviction of various oil companies, including appellee, upon the charge of a price fixing conspiracy consisting of a concerted buying program for the purchase of gasoline from independent refiners…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Davis v. Portland Seed Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. West Virginia v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. State of West Virginia v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., Alpine Pharmacy, Inc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., Cotler Drugs, Inc., and Louis Patlogan,formerly Doing Business as Patlogan's Western Pharmacy, Petitioner'-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  4. Northwestern Oil Co. v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  5. Kilpatrick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API