Legal Opinion
Baim & Blank v. Admiral Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 29, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
In this suit for treble damages and injunctive relief based upon alleged violations of the Robinson-Patman and the Sherman Acts 1 the defendants attack the complaint upon a variety of grounds. In view of the conclusion I have reached it is unnecessary to consider them all, although some are clearly lacking in merit.
An essential element of a complaint in an action brought under the anti-trust laws is an allegation of injury and damage proximately caused by the alleged wrongful conduct of the defendant. In this respect the complaint is defective as to both causes of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Feddersen Motors, Inc. v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Bader v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Dublin Distributors, Inc. v. Edward & John Burke, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1972
- Baim & Blank, Inc. v. Warren-Connelly Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Krug v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
- Arzee Supply Corp. of Conn. v. Ruberoid Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1963
- United Grocers' Co. v. Sau-Sea Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.