Charles Rubenstein, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
JOYCE, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiffs to strike the matter asserted as! a counterclaim by defendant Minnesota Amusement Company in its amended answer- and counterclaim on the ground the sanje constitutes an insufficient defense, is immaterial, impertinent and scandalous, and to dismiss the same as failing to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs also move for ¡a more definite and certain statement, such motion being conditioned upon denial of the former motion.
The plaintiffs, partners, and the predecessor corporation before them, owned and operated the Hollywood Theatre in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- In Re Sunrise Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Barr v. Dramatists Guild, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Hohensee v. Akron Beacon Journal Publishing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
- Noasha LLC v. Nordic Group of Companies, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.