Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 3, 1941No. 38PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed

This certiorari, which we allowed because of its importance, involves problems of proving a lessor’s'claim for damages for rejection of its lease in a proceeding under § 77 of the Bankruptcy Act. The lease, demising respondent’s street railway properties and equipment in Connecticut for 999 years from 1906, was rejected on December 18, 1935, by petitioners, the trustees • of the debtor, the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company.1 The annual rent reserved at rejection was close to $1,050,000 with tax, sinking fund, interest *552aricTbond retirement-adjustments, which are not material…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. Harvey Ward Locke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API