Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed
This certiorari, which we allowed because of its importance, involves problems of proving a lessor’s'claim for damages for rejection of its lease in a proceeding under § 77 of the Bankruptcy Act. The lease, demising respondent’s street railway properties and equipment in Connecticut for 999 years from 1906, was rejected on December 18, 1935, by petitioners, the trustees • of the debtor, the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company.1 The annual rent reserved at rejection was close to $1,050,000 with tax, sinking fund, interest *552aricTbond retirement-adjustments, which are not material…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Harvey Ward Locke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.