Legal Opinion
People v. Wilcox
California Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1960No. Crim. 6578PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
The People appeal from an order of the trial court reinstating a forfeited bail bond and the subsequent exoneration of the same.
The circumstances under which the bond was posted, forfeited and reinstated are as follows: the Grand Jury of Los Angeles County returned an indictment wherein one Robert Daniel Wilcox (hereinafter referred to as the defendant) was accused of the crime of issuing checks without sufficient funds, a felony. (Pen. Code, § 476a.) Defendant entered a plea of not guilty and bail was fixed in the sum of $1,000. Respondent Anchor Casualty Company is defendant’s surety on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Yoder v. YoderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. MeyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- People v. HodgesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. DurbinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. RubioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. Safety National Casualty Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. Amwest Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.