Legal Opinion
Ziganto v. Taylor
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 1961No. Civ. 19741PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
In this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, we have concluded that plaintiff and respondent’s complaint was filed one day too late and that the judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent should be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial upon the remaining issues reserved by the parties according to their stipulation.
Appellant is the owner of a lot in Palo Alto upon which he arranged for the construction of an apartment house by a general contractor. During the course of construction respondent, a subcontractor and materialman, at the request of the contractor furnished certain…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ley v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Alkus v. Johnson-Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Jarrett v. AllState InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bank of California v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Davis v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- McDougall v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.