Legal Opinion
Robert Lee Ridgeway v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 13, 1977No. 76-2145PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
The principal question raised on this appeal is whether a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum is a detainer under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. We hold that it is not.
Robert Lee Ridgeway was indicted and convicted on one count of conspiracy to import, possess and distribute cocaine. On appeal he raises four grounds for reversal:(1) That a writ of habeas corpus ad pro-sequendum is a detainer under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers and that the federal indictment against him should have been dismissed with prejudice when he was not tried within 120 days…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Richard T. FordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Esola, 53517 v. Ronald M. Groomes, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Michael Roberts, United States of America v. Charles Williams, United States of America v. Stanley YelardyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Rosencrans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- United States v. David Earl Crozier (99-6561) Charles W. Burton (99-6567), United States of America v. Charles W. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Leroy EaddyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Bernard Stroble v. Charles Anderson, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.