Legal Opinion
Bernard Stroble v. Charles Anderson, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan, Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1978No. 77-1489PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARDS, Circuit Judge.
It is a requirement of the law of our land that it be enforced in accordance with the procedures contained therein. Justice Felix Frankfurter summarized the justification for this sometimes onerous burden:
“The safeguards of ‘due process of law’ and ‘the equal protection of the laws’ summarize the history of freedom of English-speaking peoples running back to Magna Carta and reflected in the constitutional development of our people. The history of American freedom is, in no small measure, the history of procedure.” Malinski v. New York, 324 U.S. 401, 413-14, 65 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Malinski v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Richard T. FordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Robert James Pitts v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Robert Lee Ridgeway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- David Andrew Birdwell v. Jack Skeen, Jr., Criminal District Attorney of Smith County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. WhitingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Ernest Browning v. Dale FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Joel Robert ScheerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.