United States v. Richard T. Ford
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*735MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:
After lodging a detainer against appellant with state prison authorities in Massachusetts, where he was incarcerated, the federal government, on March 24, 1974, used a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequen-dum to obtain appellant’s presence in the Southern District of New York for purposes of arraignment on charges arising out of a Middletown, New York, bank robbery.1 Despite his repeated requests for a prompt trial and despite the fact that Article IV(c) of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (Detainers Act)2 requires trial within 120 days unless continuances are…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. ProvooDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- Sterling H. Nickens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Seth Yellen, A/K/A Ronald Larkins v. Thomas I. Cooper, Superintendent, Shadow Mountain Correctional Facility, and Lt. Ted Weber, Correctional OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- David Andrew Birdwell v. Jack Skeen, Jr., Criminal District Attorney of Smith County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.