Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard T. Ford

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 3, 1977No. 18-2471PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*735MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:

After lodging a detainer against appellant with state prison authorities in Massachusetts, where he was incarcerated, the federal government, on March 24, 1974, used a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequen-dum to obtain appellant’s presence in the Southern District of New York for purposes of arraignment on charges arising out of a Middletown, New York, bank robbery.1 Despite his repeated requests for a prompt trial and despite the fact that Article IV(c) of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (Detainers Act)2 requires trial within 120 days unless continuances are…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. ProvooDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
  5. Sterling H. Nickens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Seth Yellen, A/K/A Ronald Larkins v. Thomas I. Cooper, Superintendent, Shadow Mountain Correctional Facility, and Lt. Ted Weber, Correctional OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. David Andrew Birdwell v. Jack Skeen, Jr., Criminal District Attorney of Smith County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API