Horowitz v. Sacks
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to recover a judgment for damages, alleging that defendants had alienated the affections of his wife. The defendants appeared and answered and a trial was had in the lower court before the court sitting with a jury. The jury returned a verdict in the sum of fifteen thousand dollars in favor of the plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was made and the trial court made a conditional order that unless the plaintiff waived ten thousand dollars the motion would be granted, otherwise denied. The plaih tiff thereupon filed a stipulation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
- Hager v. ShindlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Ruiz v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Cripe v. CripeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Humphrey v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baxter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Rudley v. TobiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Surina v. LuceyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Vargas v. GiacosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Kramer v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.