Legal Opinion

Surina v. Lucey

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1985No. B007703PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs in an action captioned “Complaint for Personal Injury (Interference with Personal Relationship; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress)” appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained, without leave to amend, a demurrer to the second amended complaint.

The applicable rules of appellate review need little discussion. On an appeal from a judgment entered after the sustaining of a general demurrer, this court must assume the truth of all properly pleaded allegations of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Borer v. American Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Loehr v. Ventura County Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Baxter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Kajtazi v. KajtaziDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  5. Pickle v. PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Larson v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Murphy v. LS.K.Con. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Coward v. Wellmont Health SystemSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
  4. Guild Mortgage Co. v. HellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Sklar v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API