Humphrey v. Pope
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. Edward I. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action for damages. A demurrer to the amended complaint was sustained without leave to further amend, and judgment was given in favor of defendant, from which this appeal is prosecuted. The complaint alleged that at all the times mentioned in the complaint plaintiff and one W. G. Humphrey were husband and wife; on the-day of September, 1896, the husband willfully deserted plaintiff, and by reason of said desertion plaintiff “is living separate and apart from him”; defendant, “willfully and wrongfully intending to injure plaintiff and to deprive her of the affection, support,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bennett v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Foot v. CardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
- Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Carpenter v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pratt v. DalyArizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Parker v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Moberg v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- King v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.