Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Assn.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1935No. Civ. 8972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

Respondent, as plaintiff in the trial court, recovered judgment on an insurance policy. During the course of the trial, respondent moved to strike and the court granted the motion striking the testimony of one Dr. Roland H. Harris, called as a witness by appellant. The correctness of this ruling is attacked on this appeal, which is from the judgment.

Respondent was the beneficiary of an insurance policy in which his deceased wife was the insured. In making application for the policy on February 2, 1930, in response to appropriate questions in the application, deceased stated…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Edington v. . Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Renihan v. . DenninNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Smart v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Beave v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Duronslet v. KampsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Newell v. NewellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Turner v. Redwood Mutual Life Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Hogue v. MassaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Torbensen v. Family Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API