Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kanuck

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

This disciplinary proceeding stems from a report of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1 *161recommending that Respondent, George J. Kanuck, Jr., be suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of five (5) years. The Board found, inter alia, that Respondent had violated Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(3) (illegal conduct involving moral turpitude), Rule 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), Rule 1-102(A)(5) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and Rule…