In re Anonymous No. 102 D.B. 92
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania:
SALTZ, Member,
Pursuant to Rule 208(d)(2)(iii) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania herewith submits its findings and recommendations to your honorable court with respect to the above-captioned petition for discipline.
I. HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS
Respondent, [ ], was admitted to practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on or about May 11, 1982.
On June 18, 1993, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f) and after…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HolstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KanuckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992