Legal Opinion

In re Anonymous No. 102 D.B. 92

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1994No. Disciplinary Board Docket no. 102 D.B. 92Published

1Opinion of the Court

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania:

SALTZ, Member,

Pursuant to Rule 208(d)(2)(iii) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania herewith submits its findings and recommendations to your honorable court with respect to the above-captioned petition for discipline.

I. HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS

Respondent, [ ], was admitted to practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on or about May 11, 1982.

On June 18, 1993, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f) and after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HolstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KanuckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API