Legal Opinion

In re Anonymous

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1993No. Disciplinary Board Docket no. 126 D.B. 90Published

1Opinion of the Court

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania:

SLOANE, Member,

Pursuant to Rule 208(d)(2)(iii), Pa.R.D.E., the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania herewith submits *164its findings and recommendations to your honorable court with respect to the above-captioned petition for discipline.

I. HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS

On November 26, 1990, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition for discipline of respondent, docketed at no. 126 D.B. 90. The petition contained two charges of misconduct based upon respondent’s alleged misrepresentations to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. In Re OxmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Montgomery County Bar Ass'n v. HechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API