Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lewis
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 13, 1981No. 256 Disciplinary Docket 1PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
On July 18, 1979, the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel charged Súber W. Lewis (respondent) with serious acts of misconduct involving the commingling and conversion of client funds, misrepresentation, and the neglect and intentional failure properly to represent his client. After hearing, the hearing committee found that respondent had vio lated DR 1-102(A)(3)(4)(6); 6-101(A)(3); 7-101(A)(3); 9-102(A) and 9-102(B)(3)(4) 1 and recommended a private reprimand to the Disciplinary Board. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel filed exceptions to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- In the Matter of Julius Lucius Echeles, an AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Matter of LeopoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EilbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.