Legal Opinion

In re Anonymous No. 10 D.B. 91

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1993No. Disciplinary Board Docket no. 10 D.B. 91Published

1Opinion of the Court

LIEBER, Member,

Pursuant to Rule 208(d)(2)(iii) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (“board”) herewith submits its findings and recommendations to your honorable court with respect to the above-captioned petition for discipline.

I. HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS

On January 10,1991, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (hereinafter “petitioner”) filed a petition for discipline against [ ] (hereinafter “respondent”). The charges enumerated in the petition arose from respon*160dent’s representation of [A]. Respondent was retained to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KneppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KanuckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API