Whyler v. Van Tiger
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Sutter County; Phil. W: Keyser, Judge. This action was brought by Joseph Martin Whyler to recover the possession of the undivided one-half of three hundred acres of land situated in Sutter county, California, for an accounting of the rents and profits, and for one hundred and fifty dollars damages for withholding possession.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from Superior Court, Sutter County; Phil. W: Keyser, Judge. This action was brought by Joseph Martin Whyler to recover the possession of the undivided one-half of three hundred acres of land situated in Sutter county, California, for an accounting of the rents and profits, and for one hundred and fifty dollars damages for withholding possession. The land in controversy was leased to Henry Van Tiger by Mary E. Whyler, as guardian of the estate of Joseph Martin Whyler, but the lease was signed and delivered as her individual deed. The cause was tried by the court, a jury being waived,…
1Opinion of the Court
By the COURT.
There is no error in the record. We think that Mrs. Whyler was a guardian when she executed the lease to defendant, and that, the lease was properly executed.
The judgment must be affirmed. So ordered.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Elizalde v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Dennis v. BintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In Re the Guardianship of the Persons & Estates of MorehouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Bessho v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Southern T. C. Bk. v. S.D. Sav. Bk.California Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.