Legal Opinion

Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 2005No. B181881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CURRY, J.

INTRODUCTION

Petitioners Shapell Industries, Inc. and Shapell Industries Escrow 1 challenge the respondent superior court’s order granting a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint adding a new plaintiff as an individual and as the representative plaintiff of an uncertified class. Shapell contends the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to allow the second amended complaint to be filed to add a new plaintiff, real party in interest Allan Stark, because the original plaintiff, Steven J. Borecki, had voluntarily dismissed himself as a party to the action,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gogri v. Jack in the Box Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Cardiff Equities, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. First American Title Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Pirjada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. ASARCO Incorporated v. J.P. Morgan & CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API