Cardiff Equities, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHAVEZ, J.
The primary issue before us is whether a plaintiff may dismiss a complaint in the trial court after the case has been ordered into arbitration, but before an arbitration has commenced. We conclude that there *1544is nothing to preclude such a dismissal, and that after a dismissal, the trial court no longer has jurisdiction to order the parties to complete the arbitration.
L PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND STATEMENT OF FACTS
The facts are undisputed. This case involves two separate contracts. The purpose of the first contract was to document an investment in a limited partnership, and the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- James & Jackson, LLC. v. Willie Gary, LLC.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Gulf Exploration, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- MKJA Inc. v. 123 Fit Franchising, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Aronow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Aronow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Cardiff Equities, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.