Gogri v. Jack in the Box Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Maheshkuimar Gogri appeals a judgment entered after the trial court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Jack in the Box Inc. (JIB). On appeal, Gogri contends the trial court erred by (1) vacating his voluntary dismissal filed prior to the court’s order granting JIB’s motion for summary judgment; (2) granting JIB’s motion for summary judgment; and (3) awarding attorney fees to JIB. We conclude that because Gogri timely filed his voluntary dismissal, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to decide JIB’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Renda v. NevarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Law Offices of Andrew L. Ellis v. YangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Areso v. CarMax, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Pittman v. Beck Park Apartments Ltd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.