Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Dicke

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 26, 1940No. 4269PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlAND, Judge

This is an appeal by the junior party Thompson, from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Examiner of Interferences in awarding priority of invention of the six counts of the issue to the senior party Dicke. Dicke’s application, which was filed April 2, 1930, is involved with a patent to Thompson, No. 2,001,439, issued May 14, 1935, on an application filed March 17, 1933. Dicke copied the claims from the Thompson patent for the purpose of interference.

Counts 1 and 2 are illustrative of the subject matter involved and follow:

1. A single…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Windle v. Parks & Woolson Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  3. Gunn v. SavageU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farrington v. MikeskaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  2. Application of Adolph WolfenspergerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Application of Carl W. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969
  5. Marvel Specialty Co. v. Magnet Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API