Legal Opinion

Hogue v. Cowling

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 6, 1939No. 4010; No. 4011; No. 4012; No. 4013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatfield, Judge,

delivered tlie opinion of the court:

These are appeals in an interference proceeding from the decision ,of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of the inventions defined in the counts in issue — counts 1 and 2 — as follows: Count 1 to Richard J. Cowling, and count 2 to James E. Hogue.

The interference involves three parties — James E. Hogue, Richard J. Cowling, and the alleged joint inventors, Kenneth B. Little and *876Ludwig Loewenstein. In appeal No. 4010 appellant Hogue appealed from the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Solvay S.A. v. Honeywell International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Farrington v. MikeskaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. Crane v. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  4. Philco Corp. v. Radio Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1963
  5. Solvay S.A. v. Honeywell International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API