Legal Opinion
Schweyer v. Thomas
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 26, 1934No. Patent Appeal 3176PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LENROOT, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office in an interferesiee proceeding, No. 50.739, wherein said Board affirmed decisions of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellee upon all the counts in issue.
It appears from the record that said interference No. 56,739 is a consolidation of two prior interferences in the Patent Office, to wit, interference No. 56,739, comprising seventeen counts, numbered 1 to 17, inclusive, and interference No. 53,166, comprising eight counts. By order of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Petersen v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- Dreyfus v. LilienfeldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Isom v. DubbsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- Schweyer v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gordon Gould v. Arthur L. Schawlow and Charles H. TownesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Farrington v. MikeskaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Kendall v. SearlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Crane v. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Jany Renz, Jean Pierre Bourquin, Guido Gamboni and Gustav Schwarb v. Robert Michel Jacob and Gilbert Louis RegnierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.