Garand v. Pedersen
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLeNRoot, Judge
This is an interference proceeding in which appellant has brought before us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Examiner of Interferences, awarding priority of invention to appellee upon all the counts involved in the interference, six in number.
Count 1 is illustrative and reads as follows:
1. A cartridge clip arranged to hold a stack of cartridges in staggered relation formed in a double row with one. row higher than the other, said clip comprising a back and two sides for embracing the stack, said sides extending…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Farrington v. MikeskaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Crane v. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In re TanselCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Philco Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1967
- Application of Cecil L. TanselCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.