Legal Opinion
High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of Albuquerque
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 1994No. Nos. 14606, 14665PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION1
HARTZ, Judge.
The parties’ briefs on appeal present several challenging issues regarding the City of Albuquerque zoning code. Matters of procedure, however, determine the outcome of this appeal. Therefore, we present in some detail the procedural posture of this case.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
For approximately eleven years Gene Hinkle and High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture (collectively referred to as Hinkle) have owned a twenty-acre site at the northwest corner of Tramway and Indian School in Albuquerque. The site has been zoned C-2 for twenty-six years. Hinkle has developed 15.6 acres with…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. HeinsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. AhasteenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. VaughnNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Metro Maintenance Systems South, Inc. v. MilburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.