Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (W. A.), J.
In this appeal we are called upon to determine the sufficiency of an environmental impact report (EIR) for a proposed 26.4-megawatt coal-fired cogeneration plant to be constructed in the City of Hanford (City). We are also asked to determine (1) the sufficiency of the evidence contained in the EIR to support the determination of the Hanford City Council that the proposed project would have no significant impact upon the environment and (2) whether the city council had authority to approve the project in light of the “Hanford General Plan” (General Plan), which…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.