Legal Opinion
Bierman v. Hagstrom Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1959No. Civ. 24119PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
The complaint alleged, among other things, as follows: At all times mentioned therein plaintiff was engaged in the painting, contracting, and construction business. He was licensed to conduct said business, and to do the construction work required by the subcontract referred to in the complaint. About May 7, 1954, defendant Hagstrom Construction Company entered into a written contract with the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles for the construction of a housing project. On May 20, Hagstrom entered into a written…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gatti v. Highland Park Builders, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Citizens State Bank v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Weiman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Howard v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Harrison v. Butte Steel Buildings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
3Cited by13 opinions
- MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Conderback, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- General Insurance of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.