Legal Opinion

Weiman v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1959No. S. F. 20063PublishedCited by 30 opinions

James C. Travis and Carl W. Svenson for Real Party in Interest.

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Petitioners, Theodore E. Weiman and Cecelia Weiman, seek a writ of prohibition to prohibit the respondent court from taking any “further steps to enforce its order for arbitration” under a construction contract, and also a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to order a “summary trial to be set on the jury trial calendar.” The “order *712for arbitration” had been made by the trial court on July 9, 1958, following the hearing of a petition filed by John A. Nelson, Incorporated, under the provisions of section 1282 of the Code of Civil Procedure.1

Petitioners contend that they were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gatti v. Highland Park Builders, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Citizens State Bank v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Posner v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lesser Towers, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API