Legal Opinion

Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin County

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1966No. S.F. No. 22048PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Latipac, Incorporated (hereinafter defendant) petitions for a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent superior court from taking any further proceedings in an action on contract brought by the real party in interest, J. W. Lee & Co. (hereinafter plaintiff).

In this case defendant seeks to avoid its contractual obligation to plaintiff by reason of plaintiff’s failure strictly to comply with the statutory provisions which govern the licensing of contractors. The statute in question, section 7031 of the Business and Professions Code, denies to unlicensed contractors the use of the courts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Gatti v. Highland Park Builders, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Citizens State Bank v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Weiman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. Oasis WaterparkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Rushing v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API