Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railway Co. v. Beyerle
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Adams Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The complaint charges that the appellant enticed the appellee’s minor son, George Beyerle, into its employment as a brakeman; that he was employed without •the consent of the appellee, as the appellant knew; that while engaged in the discharge of the duties of his employment, he was directed to couple a car to another part of one of the appellant’s trains; that without any fault on his part, he was killed, and that the accident which caused his death resulted from -the negligence of the appellant.
The answers returned by the jury to the interrogatories very clearly show that the appellee’s son…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Mayhew v. BurnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor of the World v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Kirkpatrick v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Matchett v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Van Sickle v. BelknapIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.