Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. Dunn
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Floyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.
The appellee sued the appellant to recover for personal injuries sustained while coupling cars in making up a train of freight cars in the appellant’s switch yards. The complaint places the right of recovery upon three distinct grounds, namely: The negligence of an unskilled engineer, the negligence of an unskilled associate switchman, and maintaining a coupling link so out of repair that it could not be raised *19and adjusted to the head of the opposite draw bar. A general verdict for the plaintiff constitutes the only finding, and the motion for a new trial presents the only questions urged in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Davis v. Detroit & Milwaukee Rail RoadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Cummings v. National Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Stevens v. LeonardIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Bedford Belt Railway Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Indianapolis & Western Railway Co. v. RaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HeathIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Indiana Union Traction Co. v. PringIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.