Legal Opinion
Lynch v. Market Street Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 17, 1933No. Docket No. 8442PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendants.
A jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and defendants have appealed. The grounds for the appeal are that the verdict is unsupported, that plaintiff’s counsel was guilty of prejudicial misconduct, and that the trial court erred in its charge to the jury, in refusing certain instructions requested by defendants and in denying a motion for a new trial.
The injuries occurred near the intersection of Twenty-ninth and Mission Streets in San Francisco at about 1:30 o’clock A. M. of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Marovich v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Champagne v. A. HamBurger & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Brown v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Gish v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Moeller v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- McIntosh v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Prunty v. AllredCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.