Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1936No. L. A. 15751PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant for injuries sustained by him while a passenger in one of defendant’s street cars operated in the city of Los Angeles. The defendant has appealed from the judgment upon a bill of exceptions. The two grounds urged by appellant for a reversal of the judgment are the insufficiency of the evidence, and the excessive amount of the judgment.

The appellant owns and operates a system of electric street cars in the city of Los Angeles. One line of said system runs on and along McClintock Avenue in a generally northerly and southerly direction.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Diamond v. WeyerhaeuserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Rystinki v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Anderson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Rust v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Karsey v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Waite v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Middleton v. California Street Cable Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Jorgensen v. East Bay Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API