McIntosh v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant for injuries sustained by him while a passenger in one of defendant’s street cars operated in the city of Los Angeles. The defendant has appealed from the judgment upon a bill of exceptions. The two grounds urged by appellant for a reversal of the judgment are the insufficiency of the evidence, and the excessive amount of the judgment.
The appellant owns and operates a system of electric street cars in the city of Los Angeles. One line of said system runs on and along McClintock Avenue in a generally northerly and southerly direction.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Diamond v. WeyerhaeuserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Rystinki v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Anderson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Rust v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Karsey v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Waite v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Middleton v. California Street Cable Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Jorgensen v. East Bay Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.