Moeller v. Market Street Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
The jury awarded plaintiff $5,000 against defendants Market Street Railway Company, August Stoltz, its motorman, and Daniel Cassotta, its conductor, for personal injuries, which she claimed to have received because defendants negligently started a street car as she was alighting therefrom. From the judgment entered accordingly, defendants appeal, assigning as error (1) the insufficiency of the evidence; (2) certain instructions given and refused; (3) excessive dainages, and (4) denial of their motion for a new trial.
As is usual in this type of litigation, the respective…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Bosqui v. Sutro R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Easton v. United Trade Sch. Contracting Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Deevy v. TassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Nance v. Fresno City Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Bratt v. Western Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Robles v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.