Legal Opinion

Moeller v. Market Street Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1938No. Civ. No. 10516PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

The jury awarded plaintiff $5,000 against defendants Market Street Railway Company, August Stoltz, its motorman, and Daniel Cassotta, its conductor, for personal injuries, which she claimed to have received because defendants negligently started a street car as she was alighting therefrom. From the judgment entered accordingly, defendants appeal, assigning as error (1) the insufficiency of the evidence; (2) certain instructions given and refused; (3) excessive dainages, and (4) denial of their motion for a new trial.

As is usual in this type of litigation, the respective…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Bosqui v. Sutro R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Easton v. United Trade Sch. Contracting Co.California Supreme Court · 1916

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Deevy v. TassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Nance v. Fresno City Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Bratt v. Western Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  5. Robles v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API