Legal Opinion

Santa Paula Water Works v. Peralta

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1896No. L. A. Nos. 15, 18PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Ventura County. B. T. Williams, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Britt, C.

In this action the court below adjudged that the plaintiffs, as tenants in common, have the right to divert and use the water of the Santa Paula creek, in Ventura county, to the extent of six hundred inches, measured under a four-inch pressure, subject, however, to the superior right of defendant to divert and use fifty inches of the water, measured, as aforesaid, during “one day of twenty-four hours in each week, from Saturday afternoon to Sunday afternoon,” and subject to the further right of defendant to take one-half an inch of water in constant flow, to be used only within a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. De Necochea v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Davis v. GaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Smith v. O'haraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. de Racouillat v. SansevainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Smith v. DenniffMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. R.D. Merrill Co. v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Galiger v. McNultyMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Orange County Water District v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Estate of Tetsubumi YanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API