Legal Opinion

Smith v. Denniff

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1900No. 1,118PublishedCited by 63 opinions

On Rehearing. Former opinion (23 Montana, 65) reversed, and judgment below

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pigott

After the opinion heretofore rendered in this case (23 Mont. 65, 57 Pac. 557), the court of its own motion granted a rehearing. Additional briefs and oral arguments have been filed and made, and we are satisfied upon further consideration that the conclusion announced in the former opinion is erroneous.

The ultimate question presented for decision is whether a certain water right is appurtenant to a certain parcel of land. As preliminary to the determination of this question, it is necessary to investigate the nature of a ‘ ‘water right, ’ ’ how title to the same may be acquired, the character…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Nevada Ditch Co. v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wyatt v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Philbrick v. EwingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  5. Wimer v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1895

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TintingerMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Department of State Lands v. PettiboneMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Willey v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
  4. City of Missoula v. MixMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. St. Onge v. BlakelyMontana Supreme Court · 1926

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API