De Necochea v. Curtis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court and in the opinion of Chief Commissioner Belcher.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
A sufficient statement of this case will be found in our former opinion, filed February 23,1889.
After filing that opinion, we concluded, on account of the novelty and importance of the question decided, to order a rehearing, and the case, after full and exhaustive reargument, has been again submitted for decision.
In their printed brief, filed upon the rehearing, counsel for appellant have urged several assignments of error in addition to that upon which we held that the judgment of the superior court must be reversed; but since, after the most attentive consideration of the very able and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Broder v. Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Jennison v. KirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Barnes v. SabronNevada Supreme Court · 1875
- Irwin v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Bailey v. TintingerMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Nielson v. ParkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- McRose v. BottyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.