Legal Opinion

Wine v. Council of City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1960No. Civ. 23884PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

Petitioners sought by mandamus and certiorari (1) to review and annul the action of the Los Angeles City Council approving a tentative subdivision map of certain property, and (2) to review, terminate and annul the proceeding by which said property was annexed to the city. The court refused to issue either an alternative writ of mandamus or a writ of certiorari. Petitioners have appealed.

The undisputed facts may be summarized as follows: Some time prior to September 3,1958, the owners of a large tract of uninhabited land in the San Fernando Valley instituted proceedings to subdivide this land…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Fortenbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Kelber v. City of UplandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Wilson v. Hidden Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Gogerty v. Coachella Valley Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Kappadahl v. Alcan Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. The Pines v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API