Legal Opinion
Kappadahl v. Alcan Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 27, 1963No. Civ. 20773PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
In a consolidated appeal in three cases, appellants in each respective case, who were plaintiffs or petitioners therein, appeal from adverse judgments in favor of the respective defendants.
Questions Presented.
All three actions arise out of the granting by the Board of Zoning Adjustment of Monterey County, and its affirmance by the board of supervisors of that county, of a variance under the zoning ordinance, permitting Alcan Pacific Company, a corporation, 1 to use a certain strip of property as a driveway to Alcan’s rest home.
1. Does the filing of the subdivision map estop Monterey County…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Residents of Beverly Glen, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.