Willoughbys Camera Stores, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
OliveR, Chief Judge:
Counsel for plaintiff, in their brief, have given a clear and concise description of the merchandise before us in this case. The description is as follows:
*77The imported merchandise, the subject of the protest before the Court, is known as pocket range finders designed to be used in conjunction with photographic cameras. * * * The article is composed in chief value of a brass case as stipulated (R. 11) by Government counsel. Within the brass case there are certain brass fittings and two mirrors, one stationary and the other capable of being moved by a dial or disc knob on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. BlissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Abercrombie v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Sumitomo Shoji New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Naumes Forwarding Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Birns & Sawyer Cine Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972