R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliveh, Chief Judge:
The merchandise at bar was assessed for duty at 45 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 228 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as a microscope. The plaintiff claims it to be properly dutiable at 20 per centum ad valorem as a camera under paragraph 1551, or at 15 per centum ad valorem under the first or third provision of paragraph 353, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, as (1) articles suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy, or (2) articles having as an essential…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. BlissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Bendix Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Parsons Optical Laboratories Harper, Robinson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Willoughbys Camera Stores, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.